COVID-19 Antibodies as Predictor of Severe Dengue among Hospitalized Children with Dengue Illness in the Post-third-wave Period of COVID-19 Infection in India.

BACKGROUND: There were widespread unconfirmed reports about the increased severity of dengue post-second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India. It is known that a second dengue infection with a different strain in an individual can trigger antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). A similar phenomenon is hypothesized for severe COVID-19 infection since both dengue and COVID-19 are viral diseases with different and varying strains. However, much research is needed to confirm this hypothesis. In this context, we intended to assess the severity of dengue illness in relation to previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, possibly the role of COVID-19 antibodies as an early predictor of severe dengue illness. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of COVID-19 antibodies for early identification of severe dengue illness among children in the post-third-wave period of COVID-19 infection in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All hospitalized children with dengue illness were categorized as severe (shock and/or hemorrhage and/or multi-organ dysfunction) and non-severe dengue illness (dengue with or without warning signs) as per WHO definition. COVID-19 antibody titers were estimated in both groups. Clinical features and seroprevalence of COVID-19 antibodies were compared in both groups. RESULT: A total of 31 children were studied (13 severe and 18 non-severe dengue illnesses). The most common symptoms prior to presenting to the hospital included fever (100% in both groups), vomiting (85% in severe and 63% in non-severe), abdominal pain (85% in severe and 50% in non-severe), poor feeding (54% in severe and 28% in non-severe), and skin rashes (15% in severe and none in non-severe). The mean duration from the onset of fever to the first hospital visit was 4.6 days in severe illness and 5.3 days in non-severe dengue illness. The mean duration of hospitalization was 9.7 days in severe dengue illness and 4.1 days in non-severe dengue illness. While 92.3% of all severe dengue had significantly higher COVID-19 antibody titers, it was found elevated only in 44.4% of the children with non-severe dengue illness (p-value 0.0059; Yates' corrected p-value 0.0179). CONCLUSION: Clinical symptoms prior to presenting to the hospital were fever, vomiting, abdominal pain, poor oral feeding, and skin rashes. While fever, vomiting, and abdominal pain were seen commonly in both severe and non-severe dengue illnesses, the presence of skin rash during febrile phase is associated with severe dengue illness only. Hospitalized children having severe dengue had increased seroprevalence of COVID-19 antibodies (92.3%) compared to children with non-severe dengue (44.4%). However, there is no corelation of the severity of dengue illness with absolute values of COVID-19 antibody levels. Therefore, the presence of COVID-19 antibodies (previous COVID-19 infection) can be a predictor of severe illness in children with dengue especially if associated with poor oral feeding and skin rashes. The limitation of the study is its lesser sample size to conclude any definitive statement; nevertheless, the study paves way for a similar cohort of a larger sample size to draw conclusions.

Efficacy of rupatadine in reducing the incidence of dengue haemorrhagic fever in patients with acute dengue: A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Rupatadine was previously shown to reduce endothelial dysfunction in vitro, reduced vascular leak in dengue mouse models and to reduce the extent of pleural effusions and thrombocytopenia in patients with acute dengue. Therefore, we sought to determine the efficacy of rupatadine in reducing the incidence of dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) in patients with acute dengue. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A phase 2, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial was carried out in patients with acute dengue in Sri Lanka in an outpatient setting. Patients with ≤3 days since the onset of illness were either recruited to the treatment arm of oral rupatadine 40mg for 5 days (n = 123) or the placebo arm (n = 126). Clinical and laboratory features were measured daily to assess development of DHF and other complications. 12 (9.7%) patients developed DHF in the treatment arm compared to 22 (17.5%) who were on the placebo although this was not significant (p = 0.09, relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.08). Rupatadine also significantly reduced (p = 0.01) the proportion of patients with platelet counts <50,000 cells/mm3 and significantly reduced (p = 0.04) persisting vomiting, headache and hepatic tenderness (p<0.0001) in patients. There was a significant difference in the duration of illness (p = 0.0002) although the proportion of individuals who required hospital admission in both treatment arms. Only 2 patients on rupatadine and 3 patients on the placebo developed shock, while bleeding manifestations were seen in 6 patients on rupatadine and 7 patients on the placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Rupatadine appeared to be safe and well tolerated and showed a trend towards a reducing proportion of patients with acute dengue who developed DHF. Its usefulness when used in combination with other treatment modalities should be explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trials Registration Platform: SLCTR/2017/024.

COVID-19 with dengue shock syndrome in a child: coinfection or cross-reactivity?

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has spread globally. Coinfection with other endemic viruses is likely to complicate the clinical presentation and outcome. Information on clinical manifestations and management strategies on COVID-19 coinfection with endemic diseases in children is yet to evolve. The risk of dengue infection exists in 129 countries and it is endemic in more than 100 countries. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic might overlap with the dengue epidemics in tropical countries. We report the first paediatric case to the best of our knowledge of COVID-19 encephalitis with dengue shock syndrome. This clinical syndrome could be attributed to serological cross-reactivity, incidental coinfection or perhaps a warning for dengue-endemic regions to face the unique challenge of differentiating and managing two disease entities together. Enhanced understanding of potential COVID-19 and dengue coinfection warrants immediate attention of researchers and international health policy makers.